Surrender, Part One: On the Edge of Ourselves
- kristingapple
- May 28
- 5 min read
In life, there are times—such as during grief, burnout, heartbreak, addiction, becoming a parent, or illness—when we feel: I can’t do this anymore. Yet, beneath that feeling, another thought arises: Then let go.
In recovery communities, this is referred to as surrender. It’s not about succumbing to hopelessness, but rather handing over—transitioning from control to trust, from resistance to receptiveness. It’s a profound exhalation when you’ve exhausted all strategies.
The word surrender comes from the Old French surrendre, meaning “to give over, to yield.” Its Latin roots—sub (under) + rendere (to give back)—suggest something profound: we’re not really giving something away, but giving it back. Back to life, to God, to the unfolding of what is. Maybe even back to ourselves.
This idea—of not being separate to begin with—is at the heart of many spiritual paths. But philosophers have approached this too, each offering a different lens on what surrender might mean, not as defeat, but as an act of truth.
Kierkegaard: Surrender as the Leap Beyond Reason
Existential philosopher Søren Kierkegaard explained that we arrive at a moment when reason falters, where solutions vanish, and the sole way ahead is the leap of faith. In his view, surrender is not passive; it is a radical commitment to something beyond certainty—a readiness to stand at the brink of the unknown and release control.
Simone Weil: Surrender Through Attention
Simone Weil, a mystic and philosopher, regarded attention as a holy act of yielding. Genuine attention demands that we rid ourselves of our plans, desires, and even our self-identity, allowing us to truly perceive what is before us. In this act of emptying, she believed that grace could find its way in.
“Grace fills empty spaces, but it can only enter where there is a void to receive it.”
Lao Tzu: Surrender to the Flow of the Tao
In Taoism, surrender appears as wu wei, or effortless action—letting go of force, agenda, and struggle. Life becomes less about willpower and more about alignment with the Way. “When I let go of what I am,” Lao Tzu writes, “I become what I might be.” The surrender here is to flow, not fate.
Meister Eckhart: Detachment as Inner Freedom
Meister Eckhart, the 13th-century Christian mystic, taught that we must let go of not just possessions and ego—but even our ideas of God. Real surrender, for him, is radical detachment, where the soul becomes empty enough to hold the divine.
“The soul does not grow by addition but by subtraction.”
Alan Watts: Surrendering the Illusion of Control
Alan Watts believed the greatest illusion we suffer from is the idea that we’re separate from the rest of existence. He encouraged us to surrender not because we are weak, but because we’re already part of the whole—we just forgot.
“Muddy water is best cleared by leaving it alone.”
Carl Jung: Surrender to the Deep Psyche
Jung discussed the idea of yielding to the unconscious, viewing it not as a step backward, but as a journey of healing and unification. He believed that genuine transformation occurs when the ego releases its hold and permits an inner, greater intelligence to lead.
Surrender as Remembering
What if surrender isn’t a loss, but a return? A giving back of what was never fully ours to hold alone? The etymology hints at this. To surrender is to give under, give back, give over. There’s humility in that. There’s grace, too.
We are never entirely disconnected. Not from one another, not from nature, and not even from the aspects of ourselves we've attempted to escape. Surrender serves as the bridge back—delicate, quivering, yet genuine.
In Part Two, I’ll explore the philosophers who approached surrender in subtler, more abstract ways—through the lens of resistance, relation, and exposure: thinkers like Jean-Luc Nancy, Emmanuel Levinas, and Derrida. Their work reminds us that surrender doesn’t always look like falling to our knees—it can also look like opening to difference, being touched by the Other, or allowing ourselves to be changed by what we cannot master.
Comments